Home > Community > Community > Document: Suspicious Nonmembers?
103 Comments - 21444 Views
A page for player phenomena and a list of players that are under scrutiny.
Submitted By RahkshiPArty on 12/01/11
Mars Explorer, RahkshiParty, Community 

Hey guys, lately while I have been playing I have noticed several "skilled" nonmembers, I mean "vetaran martian skilled" Two of these are players named "BigBrother" (which I think may be a troll) and and a supicious "uof" (UFO spelling fail?) anywho, just keep on eye out for them, as they could be certian disruptable players in disquise. UPDATE: I also was palying yesterday and found a private server with about 5-10 people all with the word FaZe (not a typo), for example: FaZeMoonlight, skyFaZe ETC.
As far as I know, lots of clubs where rather violent with the exception of the Non-Constant club and Early Birds, just saying keep an eye out, and inflitrate them if you must.
 
Here is a list of other nonmembers. (CONSTANTLY UPDATING)
 
 
BigBrother
uof (that IS his name, not a typo)
 Godly- <this guy IS the hacker, I was playing him in Dogfighters Dream, I addressed him as Mortal (as usual), then challenged him to a dogfight, he responded by messing with the gravity, expanding RORB's and instagating the Flynn Virus (copyrighted by kruncher), I belive he is also our chatbox hacker. He impersonated NigaHiga too, and quoting him: "I got Chrismas Swag"! (which still is pretty awesome to say in the least).
    
---- 
____UPDATE____
 
We seem to have had some serious chatbox hacking and the "Flynn Virus"
 happen in "dad's- game" as of Monday, Febuary 6 around 7:30 PM.
  
 
 
Rahkshi

» Comment on Document (Too Many Replies for Fancy Display) 103 Comments
» Reply to Comment
Re: Suspicious Nonmembers?
3 days - 9,611v
Posted 2012/01/11 - 19:16 GMT
Yes, I happen to be in contact in battle with "BigBrother". Supposedly, he's... very skilled.
However, he was playing a responsive-to-comments-but-doesn't-comment-in-return- game.
 
I happen to be kidding around when I said, "Next thing you know, BigSister is gonna join here."
 
And just like that, "--YouGuessedIt-- BigSister" joined.
 
Then, BigMama. Then BigPapa. It was all hilarious at first, but then it got annoying. BigGrandpa then joined. And then from there, I was thinkin' that dude had some sort of supercomputer for his software to handle all those windows open.
 
But, anyways, that isn't the point. Point is, I agree with you, and these Veteran-skilled players are not to be triffled with. Be on your watch, everyone, cause I think there's more to this than meets the eye...
» Reply to Comment
Re: Suspicious Nonmembers?
1 week - 32,767v
Posted 2012/01/11 - 19:17 GMT
I don't really see why this is anything to worry about. There are some n00bs who are reasonably good, it's just cos they play so much. There's too much drama about tiny issues nowadays on Mars...
» Reply to Comment
Re: Suspicious Nonmembers?
5 hours - 592v
Posted 2012/01/11 - 19:19 GMT
I was playing with Cream Soda and Timber, Timber thinks it might be Tichead, but he seriously dislikes him....
» Reply to Comment
Re: Suspicious Nonmembers?
5 days - 12,389v
Posted 2012/01/11 - 19:19 GMT
Lol, some of the Un-Reg's are very skilled, but most of them never chat/ are N00BS
» Reply to Comment
Re: Suspicious Nonmembers?
5 hours - 592v
Posted 2012/01/11 - 19:20 GMT
If you wll read Ectoshock's comment, you will see why I am worried..
» Reply to Comment
Re: Suspicious Nonmembers?
1 week - 32,767v
Posted 2012/01/11 - 19:22 GMT
I don't see why this is such a big issue... So what if there are some unregistered players who are good?
You're new to this forum, which means you were unregistered just a few days ago, yet I'm sure you're not that bad at this game.
Again, I fail to see how this is a big deal...
 
» Reply to Comment
Re: Suspicious Nonmembers?
1 week - 32,767v
Posted 2012/01/11 - 19:22 GMT
I did read Ecto's comment, I simply think he's making a big deal of things just like you are.
» Reply to Comment
Re: Suspicious Nonmembers?
3 days - 9,611v
Posted 2012/01/11 - 19:24 GMT
Practically.
 
BigBrother and UFO are... what kind of n00bs are they? Silent Noobs? Ninja Noobs? Juggernaut Noobs? Oh, yes, Juggernaut Noobs.
 
Juggernaut Noob: A non-registered or registered noob who happens to be dominating a dogfight where we least expect them too, and continues the onslaught with or without response, only until the last moment.
» Reply to Comment
Re: Suspicious Nonmembers?
5 hours - 592v
Posted 2012/01/11 - 19:24 GMT
Whoops, I actually have been playing for about two years, I will stop playing for about a month, then get on again, and I actually registered last year.... chasing a rabbit 
 
(__/) 
(='.'=) 
(")_(")
» Reply to Comment
Re: Suspicious Nonmembers?
5 days - 12,389v
Posted 2012/01/11 - 19:27 GMT
There are bigger problem's then this Rahkshi...
» Reply to Comment
Re: Suspicious Nonmembers?
5 hours - 592v
Posted 2012/01/11 - 19:27 GMT
Strategy ideas anyone?
» Reply to Comment
Re: Suspicious Nonmembers?
3 days - 9,611v
Posted 2012/01/11 - 19:30 GMT
Let's just keep doin' what we do best - Have fun.
 
Forget BigBrother and UFO for now.
 
When the time comes, we will dig deeper into the confinds of their skill(s).
 
As for now, let's just Mars Explore.
» Reply to Comment
Re: Suspicious Nonmembers?
5 hours - 592v
Posted 2012/01/11 - 19:31 GMT
Er..are you refering to the Ship's Game of infinity? 
» Reply to Comment
Re: Suspicious Nonmembers?
5 days - 12,389v
Posted 2012/01/11 - 19:32 GMT
Thats is a problem too.... But BIGGER then that...
» Reply to Comment
Re: Suspicious Nonmembers?
5 hours - 592v
Posted 2012/01/11 - 19:33 GMT
All of you guys are on the forums right now. But I do not see you playing.... different server?
» Reply to Comment
Re: Suspicious Nonmembers?
5 hours - 592v
Posted 2012/01/11 - 19:36 GMT
One thing I will say is that I am new to the fourm itself,  could you elighten me on the problems?
» Reply to Comment
Re: Suspicious Nonmembers?
5 days - 12,389v
Posted 2012/01/11 - 19:40 GMT
We are not playing right now, we are on the forum's only. Look around the forum's for anything about the X-Clan. (You will have to dig in the Mod log)
» Reply to Comment
Re: Suspicious Nonmembers?
1 week - 32,767v
Posted 2012/01/11 - 19:44 GMT
What exactly is this obsession with the X-Clan Cav? The X-Clan is not currently causing a single problem, and it hasn't been causing any problems for ages, as far as I know it's not even active anymore.
 
» Reply to Comment
Re: Suspicious Nonmembers?
5 days - 12,389v
Posted 2012/01/11 - 19:46 GMT
*Ignores Pan* Random comment: They may be planning a uprise...
» Reply to Comment
Re: Suspicious Nonmembers?
5 hours - 592v
Posted 2012/01/11 - 19:58 GMT
0______0 
» Reply to Comment
Re: Suspicious Nonmembers?
5 days - 12,389v
Posted 2012/01/11 - 20:00 GMT
Yup, no lie
» Reply to Comment
Re: Suspicious Nonmembers?
4 days - 13,880v
Posted 2012/01/11 - 20:01 GMT
Ignoring suggestions is also your choice and might make people mad at you.
» Reply to Comment
Re: Suspicious Nonmembers?
3 days - 9,611v
Posted 2012/01/11 - 20:03 GMT
I don't think so.
 
The majority of the common players are probably just not on. 
 
Mars isn't what it used to be, and hopefully, through time, Mars will return to a good age as it should, in addition to hoping that some of the old, legendary, popular, and common players would return more often.
» Reply to Comment
Re: Suspicious Nonmembers?
5 days - 12,389v
Posted 2012/01/11 - 20:04 GMT
Its true Ecto, they are reqruiting... I've heard underling chatter, DarknessX is back.
» Reply to Comment
Re: Suspicious Nonmembers?
5 hours - 592v
Posted 2012/01/11 - 20:05 GMT
Allright, can't find anything except references *class begins* Cav! Enlighten me once again.
» Reply to Comment
Re: Suspicious Nonmembers?
5 days - 12,389v
Posted 2012/01/11 - 20:10 GMT
The X-Clan was one of the first clubs that wasn't peaceful, in fact, it was one of the first period. They tried to take ove Mars back then, and they may try again. Any other answers reqruire looking DEEP in Mod log. Bagels joined them a month before they 'disbadned', some info on this time click here 
P.S.: Please do not call me Cav, its Temp
» Reply to Comment
Re: Suspicious Nonmembers?
5 hours - 592v
Posted 2012/01/11 - 20:14 GMT
Would (BlackJesterX)+ be one of them? He is on right now..
» Reply to Comment
Re: Suspicious Nonmembers?
5 days - 12,389v
Posted 2012/01/11 - 20:16 GMT
I don't know, but i will find out...
» Reply to Comment
Re: Suspicious Nonmembers?
1 week - 32,767v
Posted 2012/01/11 - 20:19 GMT
Uh... X-clan?... Mods please hide this post, this is just getting stupid.
» Reply to Comment
Re: Suspicious Nonmembers?
2 hours - 250v
Posted 2012/01/11 - 23:52 GMT
@pancakes um... not to be harsh but instead of telling the mods how to do their job, we should just let them do it.
» Reply to Comment
Re: Suspicious Nonmembers?
4 weeks - 32,767v
Posted 2012/01/12 - 0:25 GMT
Agreed scarecrow thanks.  
 
'cake's, we mods read the post before reading your comments. Do you catch the syntax there?
» Reply to Comment
Re: Suspicious Nonmembers?
1 week - 32,767v
Posted 2012/01/12 - 4:13 GMT
Big Brother is watching.
O.O
 
K, thanks...?
The Xclan: read this post.
» Reply to Comment
Re: Suspicious Nonmembers?
1 day - 3,795v
Posted 2012/01/12 - 6:21 GMT
BigBrother said that his goal was to beat every player in the Mars community at their own game. He claims that he's already beaten every player except for Mad_Jax, and said so only after Mad_Jax had left. He has a very big ego, perhaps bigger than his dogfighting skills. So, ibcf had a dogfight with him, and, well, he's just a decent gyride-using player. He had a tough time fighting ibcf, and I'd say ibcf did better in the dogfight overall. I wouldn't worry about him. And he most definitely hasn't "beaten" every player in the Mars community. I'm sure most people haven't even heard of BigBrother!
» Reply to Comment
Re: Suspicious Nonmembers?
1 day - 5,338v
Posted 2012/01/12 - 6:25 GMT
If they're skilled, it don't matter if they're non-members or not.  
Sounds like to me that theres going to be some more dogfights.
» Reply to Comment
Re: Suspicious Nonmembers?
1 day - 3,795v
Posted 2012/01/12 - 15:33 GMT
Wait, now I'm curious. Who here has had a dogfight with BigBrother?
» Reply to Comment
Re: Suspicious Nonmembers?
3 days - 10,628v
Posted 2012/01/12 - 17:22 GMT
Trust me, they are not coming back.  I would know if they were.
 
Even if they do come back, there is no reason to think they would cause trouble.
» Reply to Comment
Re: Suspicious Nonmembers?
3 days - 10,628v
Posted 2012/01/12 - 17:25 GMT
When he beats, Mad_Jax, Delphinius, and Kruncher, he can claim to be the best, but not until then.
 
Then again, I've beaten them all over short intervals (<5 points), but I would never claim to be better than they are.
» Reply to Comment
Re: Suspicious Nonmembers?
5 hours - 592v
Posted 2012/01/12 - 19:21 GMT
I have, beat him too, but last i saw him was the dogfight with Eric, You, and Soda.
» Reply to Comment
Re: Suspicious Nonmembers?
1 week - 32,767v
Posted 2012/01/12 - 19:25 GMT
Haha I hope I'll see him on sometime >:)
» Reply to Comment
Re: Suspicious Nonmembers?
1 week - 32,767v
Posted 2012/01/12 - 21:29 GMT
He's never played me.
His statement is incorrect.
I want to play him sometime... >:D *looks forward to good dogfight*
» Reply to Comment
Re: Suspicious Nonmembers?
5 hours - 592v
Posted 2012/01/12 - 22:13 GMT
 I started a game titled BigBrother VS RahkshiParty, to draw him out, he did not show up, next time he shows up, do not ban him, kick his BigBrothers! >:D
» Reply to Comment
Re: Suspicious Nonmembers?
4 days - 13,245v
Posted 2012/01/12 - 22:14 GMT
He and a few other people hacked games last night for IP adresses.
» Reply to Comment
Re: Suspicious Nonmembers?
1 hour - 128v
Posted 2012/01/12 - 22:18 GMT
Hi
» Reply to Comment
Re: Suspicious Nonmembers?
4 days - 13,245v
Posted 2012/01/12 - 22:19 GMT
!!! Woah !!!
» Reply to Comment
Re: Suspicious Nonmembers?
1 week - 32,767v
Posted 2012/01/12 - 22:27 GMT
You again?
» Reply to Comment
Re: Suspicious Nonmembers?
4 days - 13,245v
Posted 2012/01/12 - 22:48 GMT
This kid hasn't been here for a long time and the first thing they did was post something noobish. All of a sudden " POOF! " their baaaacccckkkk.
» Reply to Comment
Re: Suspicious Nonmembers?
1 week - 32,767v
Posted 2012/01/12 - 23:30 GMT
Nor me.
» Reply to Comment
Re: Suspicious Nonmembers?
1 week - 32,767v
Posted 2012/01/13 - 0:21 GMT
I know who it is; why do you think I said "You again?"?
» Reply to Comment
Re: Suspicious Nonmembers?
4 days - 13,245v
Posted 2012/01/13 - 0:22 GMT
Wtf?!? you think that's me?
 
That's not me!
» Reply to Comment
Re: Suspicious Nonmembers?
1 week - 32,767v
Posted 2012/01/13 - 0:25 GMT
Paranoid much!?
I replied TO HIS COMMENT. Look at the PRETTYFULINTERESTINGDOTTEDLINES.
» Reply to Comment
Re: Suspicious Nonmembers?
4 days - 13,245v
Posted 2012/01/13 - 0:27 GMT
dotted lines?
» Reply to Comment
Re: Suspicious Nonmembers?
5 hours - 592v
Posted 2012/01/13 - 0:53 GMT
Congrats for being the first to disrupt this well thought out post, get up to speed on whats happening, then post something about the subject.... I am thanking you in advance for reading the rules. 
        
 
BEWARE THE CLAN OF OF THE BIGBOTHER!
» Reply to Comment
Re: Suspicious Nonmembers?
1 week - 32,767v
Posted 2012/01/13 - 3:06 GMT
I was in that hacked game. It was freaky. Audrey help us!!!

Literally, all the settings were flying all over with ego tints, bans and xobs.
0_o freaky stuff
» Reply to Comment
Re: Suspicious Nonmembers?
4 days - 13,245v
Posted 2012/01/13 - 3:09 GMT
EXACTLY!!
» Reply to Comment
Re: Suspicious Nonmembers?
1 day - 3,795v
Posted 2012/01/13 - 3:38 GMT
No no no, it wasn't a hacked game, it's just Unity imploding. Don't worry, there's no hackers.
» Reply to Comment
Re: Suspicious Nonmembers?
4 days - 13,245v
Posted 2012/01/13 - 3:41 GMT
No! There are hackers! It JUST happned again! -_-
» Reply to Comment
Re: Suspicious Nonmembers?
1 day - 3,795v
Posted 2012/01/13 - 3:45 GMT
What happened, huh? What makes you so convinced that it's a "hacker?"
» Reply to Comment
Re: Suspicious Nonmembers?
4 days - 13,245v
Posted 2012/01/13 - 3:48 GMT
They even say that they hack the games. -_- Once they say that, the computers start acting weird and then they either kick you of or they show IP addresses
» Reply to Comment
Re: Suspicious Nonmembers?
1 day - 3,795v
Posted 2012/01/13 - 3:54 GMT
Okay. What were their names? How do you know they're not just idiots posing as hackers? What evidence suggests that they have those abilities?
 
 
 
(Sorry for the non-related posts here)
» Reply to Comment
Re: Suspicious Nonmembers?
4 days - 13,245v
Posted 2012/01/13 - 3:58 GMT
TheBigBrother and there were people, but I would rather keep their names private. I will tell a mod.
» Reply to Comment
Re: Suspicious Nonmembers?
1 day - 3,795v
Posted 2012/01/13 - 4:10 GMT
Uhh, Rahkshi? What's going on with this game here? It says you're in it, and you are, but nobody else seems to see you in the game. I am shooting you right now, and getting points, but it's invisible to them. Please enlighten me.
 
Again, I don't think we should be worried too much about BigBrother.
» Reply to Comment
Re: Suspicious Nonmembers?
1 day - 5,338v
Posted 2012/01/13 - 4:43 GMT
Nevery seen BigBrother either. Can't wait to have a dogfight with him. 
» Reply to Comment
Re: Suspicious Nonmembers?
1 day - 3,795v
Posted 2012/01/13 - 5:37 GMT
You wouldn't be too impressed Paladin. He's not that amazing.
» Reply to Comment
Re: Suspicious Nonmembers?
5 hours - 592v
Posted 2012/01/13 - 5:39 GMT
Just rather annoying..
» Reply to Comment
Re: Suspicious Nonmembers?
1 day - 5,338v
Posted 2012/01/13 - 5:59 GMT
Dang, was hoping to get my butt canned sometime soon.
» Reply to Comment
Re: Suspicious Nonmembers?
1 day - 3,795v
Posted 2012/01/13 - 6:30 GMT
What? Like you're bored with the players that are already here?
» Reply to Comment
Re: Suspicious Nonmembers?
4 weeks - 32,767v
Posted 2012/01/13 - 9:21 GMT
Rahkishi please resolve this post. 
» Reply to Comment
Re: Suspicious Nonmembers?
1 day - 5,338v
Posted 2012/01/13 - 14:52 GMT
No, I was hoping that somebody else would woop me as well.
» Reply to Comment
Re: Suspicious Nonmembers?
1 day - 3,795v
Posted 2012/01/13 - 14:59 GMT
You know Rahkshi, I think I've had enough of BigBrother. He is silly to remain anonymous, and if he wants to remain so, just let him.
» Reply to Comment
Re: Suspicious Nonmembers?
5 hours - 592v
Posted 2012/01/13 - 18:56 GMT
I am resolving this, it is not really going anywhere and unless we can prove he is hacking IP addresses, then I will start up the thread again.
 
I look forward to dogfighting you all today!  
» Reply to Comment
Re: Suspicious Nonmembers?
23 hours - 3,074v
Posted 2012/02/07 - 8:12 GMT
The name "BigBrother" is a reference to George Orwell's novel 1984, where a omnipotent figurehead called "Big Brother" controls a world superpower, if that helps at all.
» Reply to Comment
Re: Suspicious Nonmembers?
5 days - 22,986v
Posted 2012/02/07 - 14:32 GMT
Oh yeah? 
 
There were two non-members I saw, Brad...bitt... and Rambo, who were really experiance. I thought it was kruncher....
» Reply to Comment
Re: Suspicious Nonmembers?
1 day - 5,985v
Posted 2012/02/07 - 14:36 GMT
A guy named Anonymous is an experienced player, he made me look like an newb when we fought. What's so bad about non-member players? There just playing. I've seen big brother and Uof, their just playing.
» Reply to Comment
Re: Suspicious Nonmembers?
1 week - 32,767v
Posted 2012/02/07 - 16:09 GMT
I slugged it out with bib brother for 30 minutes and won, barely. :P
It's creepy.
» Reply to Comment
Re: Suspicious Nonmembers?
5 hours - 592v
Posted 2012/02/07 - 16:28 GMT
Yeah, if you read the update, the problem is hacking not really BB anymore.
» Reply to Comment
Re: Suspicious Nonmembers?
2 days - 3,596v
Posted 2012/02/07 - 16:38 GMT
Lolol, if only you knew...
» Reply to Comment
Re: Suspicious Nonmembers?
5 days - 10,809v
Posted 2012/02/07 - 19:30 GMT
Sorry for asking but what is the X-Clan?
» Reply to Comment
Re: Suspicious Nonmembers?
5 days - 10,809v
Posted 2012/02/07 - 19:36 GMT
Have you guys seen the hacker called vehicle(clone) / Goldy?
» Reply to Comment
Re: Suspicious Nonmembers?
2 days - 3,596v
Posted 2012/02/07 - 19:45 GMT
A Vehicle(clone) instance is just a bot.
» Reply to Comment
Re: Suspicious Nonmembers?
5 days - 10,809v
Posted 2012/02/07 - 19:48 GMT
No, that is his name when you look at the list. He was hacking this morning
» Reply to Comment
Re: Suspicious Nonmembers?
2 days - 3,596v
Posted 2012/02/07 - 19:49 GMT
No, it's a bot instance. Trust me, I've been around a lot longer than you.
» Reply to Comment
Re: Suspicious Nonmembers?
5 days - 10,809v
Posted 2012/02/07 - 19:54 GMT
Ok if you say so, but even ibcf and flynn thought it was a hacker because it/he was saying things through Spongejax's computer.
» Reply to Comment
Re: Suspicious Nonmembers?
5 days - 10,809v
Posted 2012/02/07 - 20:13 GMT
OMG!!! He JUST hacked my game now!!!!!, it keeps saying stuff like (Fai)+ switched to a yacht and stuff but not in the message colour (blue) but in the grey colour like when something happenes!
» Reply to Comment
Re: Suspicious Nonmembers?
2 days - 3,596v
Posted 2012/02/07 - 20:17 GMT
I think the Hacker took Fai's account cause he left or something.
» Reply to Comment
Re: Suspicious Nonmembers?
5 days - 10,809v
Posted 2012/02/07 - 22:01 GMT
Hmmmm that was probably it!
 
 
» Reply to Comment
Re: Suspicious Nonmembers?
5 days - 22,986v
Posted 2012/02/07 - 23:38 GMT
To answer your question, styrker: usually, registered members have more experiance because they got board of being non-members. More experiance= more knowledge of dogfighting.
 
Etah was really good and I never met him before..
Although I believe he was registered....
» Reply to Comment
Re: Suspicious Nonmembers?
4 days - 13,245v
Posted 2012/02/08 - 0:33 GMT
Did you see MEB PocketMAD?....
 
 
» Reply to Comment
Re: Suspicious Nonmembers?
1 week - 32,767v
Posted 2012/02/08 - 0:40 GMT
GO TO THE HACKING PAGE!!!
 
Thank you party for being the first one to sound the alarm.
Using snipping tool, i got lots of pics.
 
HE CAN GET YOUR IP!!!
IMITATE YOU
NOT BE A PLAYER AND CHAT
CHANGE SETTINGS
» Reply to Comment
Re: Suspicious Nonmembers?
1 week - 32,767v
Posted 2012/02/08 - 0:41 GMT
bombard aubrey with PMs please! This is serious.
» Reply to Comment
Re: Suspicious Nonmembers?
4 days - 13,245v
Posted 2012/02/08 - 0:56 GMT
I agree and I think it should be atleast one PM at a time unless it is very ergent or important that Aubrey knows.
» Reply to Comment
Re: Suspicious Nonmembers?
1 week - 32,767v
Posted 2012/02/08 - 1:04 GMT
Im guessing that wasnt chamberlain
» Reply to Comment
Re: Suspicious Nonmembers?
4 days - 13,245v
Posted 2012/02/08 - 1:13 GMT
lol no it was me. I accdently pressed the wrong button while I was typing.
» Reply to Comment
Re: Suspicious Nonmembers?
1 week - 32,767v
Posted 2012/02/08 - 1:14 GMT
You don't spell like Chamberlain.
» Reply to Comment
Re: Suspicious Nonmembers?
4 days - 13,245v
Posted 2012/02/08 - 1:26 GMT
I swear to God im Chamberlain. What do you mean by that?
» Reply to Comment
Re: Suspicious Nonmembers?
1 week - 32,767v
Posted 2012/02/08 - 1:32 GMT
The typing, the spelling i donno
» Reply to Comment
Re: Suspicious Nonmembers?
4 days - 13,245v
Posted 2012/02/08 - 1:35 GMT
Dunno... and I accedently made it slanted.
» Reply to Comment
Re: Suspicious Nonmembers?
1 day - 5,985v
Posted 2012/02/08 - 1:49 GMT
OMG!!! For damn sakes! It's her! Omg this is just so stupid!
» Reply to Comment
Re: Suspicious Nonmembers?
1 week - 32,767v
Posted 2012/02/08 - 2:00 GMT
Fine...fine
» Reply to Comment
Re: Suspicious Nonmembers?
4 days - 13,245v
Posted 2012/02/08 - 2:01 GMT
Ok?
» Reply to Comment
Re: Suspicious Nonmembers?
1 week - 32,767v
Posted 2012/02/08 - 2:01 GMT
Hey Mr.Haxor, (his name)
why dont you show yourself?
» Reply to Comment
Re: Suspicious Nonmembers?
5 days - 22,986v
Posted 2012/02/08 - 3:24 GMT
Daxhaxor? What?
» Reply to Comment
Re: Suspicious Nonmembers?
9 hours - 2,030v
Posted 2012/02/17 - 23:01 GMT
This is a job for Dr.Haxnot*grabs throwing computers* But really,is Mars really hackable?
» Reply to Comment
Re: Suspicious Nonmembers?
1 day - 5,985v
Posted 2012/02/17 - 23:29 GMT
Yes. Your ports and maybe even your IP address is always open. Nothing's protecting mars from hackers.


» Comment on Document (Too Many Replies for Fancy Display) 103 Comments
 

This website is powered by Plexpedia
Usage of this site constitutes agreement to the » Legal Stuff